Nov 22 2009
REALTORs Property Resource (RPR) is No Good
If you’re an agent you should do some research on the proposed RPR or Realtors Property Resource.
You can read about it here.
http://www.inman.com/news/2009/11/12/mls-buy-in-key-nar-database?page=0%2C4
and here
http://www.inman.com/news/2009/11/14/rpr-execs-under-fire-nar
Below is a snippet from the 1000watt blog posted on Inman. If you’d rather a more concise description skip down past the quote.
The NAR has taken over certain technology assets of Cyberhomes from LPS (formerly known as FNRES) in order to bring its RPR (Realtors Property Resource) project, as well as its consumer-facing play, HouseLogic, to market. To do this, they have created Realtors Property Resource LLC — a wholly owned subsidiary of the NAR.
Certain LPS executives, including Cyberhomes GM Marty Frame, will be making the transition over to NAR/RPR (see Inman News article). Frame will serve as the president of the new entity. Dale Ross, who was co-founder of MRIS, the nation’s largest MLS, will be CEO. LPS will also provide call center support and other services as part of the deal.
The RPR database will contain parcel information on nearly 150 million properties through a data license from LPS, which (along with First American) is one of the two major sources of public property data.
This is interesting news, but let’s back up a minute for those of you who have more well-rounded lives than I (my fellow online RE junkies can skip down to my take on what this deal means).
The RPR is the national property database initiative that the NAR has been quietly working on for some time. It has gone by a number of names over the past couple years, including “Gateway,” “The Real Estate Channel,” and the “Library/Archive.” It will aggregate tons of property data, including public records, in one place. This will be a Realtor-only database. The idea is to keep agents and brokers competitive amidst widespread data diffusion and other challenges.
HouseLogic.com is a NAR-owned public destination site that will be unveiled next week at the NAR EXPO. The site is part of the NAR’s long-term strategy to engage consumers on behalf of its members.
RIN is the “Realtors Information Network,” a for-profit arm of the NAR from which the RPR sprung. It was conceived for the purpose of creating an ill-fated online real estate service nearly 15 years ago. It was proprietary, something like a Prodigy or early AOL-type service. It blew up, costing the NAR millions. It was from that failure that the present-day Realtor.com was born, in 1996.
Thanks to Brian Boero and Inman for the above snippet.
If you don’t subscribe to Inman here’s the gist…

Sometimes it feels like this is my relationship with NAR...
REALTORs Property Resource in a Nutshell
Basically, NAR would love to create another cash cow like Realtor.com by taking our MLS data and building a system around it, then selling it to the likes of ANYONE WHO WILL PAY FOR IT including government agencies. Can you say appraisal districts? Hope everyone is ready for their taxes to go up once we expose our complete MLS data (even in aggregate).
A Better Idea
And you folks are Realtors like me…. Why doesn’t our MLS ever agree to give any of us all the data for free so I can sell it to other people? IDX feeds for members are $200 per year now (or thereabouts).
I’ve got an idea. Why don’t all the MLS systems around the country give me the data. Then, you know, I’ll build a website with your images, your listing data, and publicly available records and then I’ll sell the services to you and other entities for a profit? Of course your dues may go up a bit since you’ll have to hire someone at ABOR to handle all this data exchange, help NAR with any issues they have, etc, etc.
Sounds like a good deal, right? Who’s on board?
I’m not a data entry robot working to make NAR and their partners money while paying Realtor.com $50 a listing to “showcase” my data on their website, not to mention a website that is worthless without said data.
Who Wants Higher Property Taxes?
In Texas, we are a non-disclosure state and they want to sell the info to government agencies. Um.. I’m pretty sure that all the appraisal districts will love that. Personally, I think this is the dumbest thing NAR members could do to themselves. If NAR wants said data for their system our MLS should charge them accordingly. I think $100 per listing sounds about right. Then we could automatically get a featured listing in Realtor.com and have $50 profit that could go to reduce or eliminate our MLS fees.
Sounds more fair to me. NAR can go and partner and sell the data, but they need to BUY IT FIRST.
Aside from all this… Why do I, as an agent in central Texas need, or care about accurate valuation or data about property in Montana? I’m not licensed there. I don’t sell there. And NAR Code of Ethics Article 11 says I can’t because I’m not competent in the workings of real estate in Montana.
Why should my dollars go to fund a NAR company that makes profits for LPS Real Estate (an RPR partner) and allows the data that is our lifeblood to go out to whomever?
I’ve only been thinking about this for a few days so I could be wrong. I would love to hear what other folks at our board or at any board across the nation think. If you are for or against the RPR and have an interest in real estate other than being a salesperson please disclose it so we can get a read on where each stakeholder stands.
Joe Cline – REMAX Capital City
http://www.inman.com/news/2009/11/12/mls-buy-in-key-nar-database?page=0%2C4
and here
http://www.inman.com/news/2009/11/14/rpr-execs-under-fire-nar
If you don’t subscribe to Inman here’s the gist… Basically, NAR would love to create another cash cow like Realtor.com by taking our MLS data and building a system around it, then selling it to the likes of ANYONE WHO WILL PAY FOR IT including government agencies. Can you say appraisal districts? Hope everyone is ready for their taxes to go up once we expose our complete MLS data (even in aggregate).
And you folks are Realtors like me…. Why doesn’t our MLS ever agree to give any of us all the data for free so I can sell it to other people? IDX feeds for members are $200 per year now (or thereabouts).
I’ve got an idea. Why don’t all the MLS systems around the country give me the data. Then, you know, I’ll build a website with your images, your listing data, and publicly available records and then I’ll sell the services to you and other entities for a profit? Of course your dues may go up a bit since you’ll have to hire someone at ABOR to handle all this data exchange, help NAR with any issues they have, etc, etc.
Sounds like a good deal, right? Who’s on board?
I’m not a data entry robot working to make NAR and their partners money while paying Realtor.com $50 a listing to “showcase” my data on their website, not to mention a website that is worthless without said data.
In Texas, we are a non-disclosure state and they want to sell the info to government agencies. Um.. I’m pretty sure that all the appraisal districts will love that. Personally, I think this is the dumbest thing NAR members could do to themselves. If NAR wants said data for their system our MLS should charge them accordingly. I think $100 per listing sounds about right. Then we could automatically get a featured listing in Realtor.com and have $50 profit that could go to reduce or eliminate our MLS fees.
Sounds more fair to me. NAR can go and partner and sell the data, but they need to BUY IT FIRST.
Aside from all this… Why do I, as an agent in central Texas need, or care about accurate valuation or data about property in Montana? I’m not licensed there. I don’t sell there. And NAR Code of Ethics Article 11 says I can’t because I’m not competent in the workings of real estate in Montana.
Why should my dollars go to fund a NAR company that makes profits for LPS Real Estate (an RPR partner) and allows the data that is our lifeblood to go out to whomever?
I’ve only been thinking about this for a few days so I could be wrong. I would love to hear what other folks at our board think.
Joe Cline – REMAX Capital City

